In Capital City Church of Christ v. Novak, 2007WL1501095 (Tex. App. — Austin May 23, 2007, no pet. h.), the court joined other courts in recognizing that the presumptions that can be used to disqualify a lawyer — e.g., that if there is a substantial relationship between two matters, it is presumed that the lawyer acquired confidential information that could be used against the client in the subsequent matter — had no place in a malpractice suit.