TAG: UPL: LegalEthics.com resources relating to Unauthorized practice of law (UPL).. Subscribe
Source Peter Krakaur|2017-06-26T18:33:54-07:00Apr 25th, 2014|Categories: LegalEthics, Post|Tags: Internet Use, UPL, Websites|
The South Carolina Supreme Court ruled that LegalZoom’s services do not constitute the unauthorized practice of law. See summary at 3 Geeks and a Law Blog.
Source Peter Krakaur|2017-06-26T18:34:01-07:00Apr 24th, 2013|Categories: LegalEthics, Post|Tags: California, Internet Use, UPL|
A California lawyer's lawsuit against on online legal service provider alleging unauthorized practice of law withstood a demurrer. See Law Offices of Mathew Higbee v. Expungement Assistance Services, Cal. Ct. [...]
Source Peter Krakaur|2017-06-26T18:34:02-07:00Feb 20th, 2013|Categories: LegalEthics, Post|Tags: ABA, UPL|
On February 11, 2013, the ABA Commission on Ethics 20/20 filed revised resolutions 107 A & 107 B relating to limited practice authority for foreign In-House Counsel.
Source Peter Krakaur|2017-07-11T11:29:39-07:00Aug 4th, 2006|Categories: LegalEthics, Post|Tags: Advertising, Attorney-client relationship, Confidentiality, Conflicts, North Carolina, UPL, Websites|
North Carolina 2005 Formal Ethics Opinion 10 (January 20, 2006) discusses the ethical considerations of a virtual law practice and unbundled legal serivces.
Source Peter Krakaur|2017-06-26T18:40:54-07:00Sep 9th, 2005|Categories: LegalEthics, Post|Tags: Oregon, States, UPL|
Oregon State Bar Legal Ethics Comm, Op. 2005-137 (August 2005) discusses whether lawyers may engage in joint venture to offer web-based online legal information system for a fee.
Source Peter Krakaur|2017-06-26T18:40:59-07:00Nov 3rd, 2004|Categories: LegalEthics, Post|Tags: Advertising, Arizona, States, UPL, Websites|
A national lawyer association ethically may place its membership directory on its Internet web site, categorized by practice areas. See Arizona Opinion 99-10 (September 1999). The association may want to: [...]
Source Peter Krakaur|2017-06-26T18:41:08-07:00Dec 10th, 2002|Categories: LegalEthics, Post|Tags: Illinois, States, UPL, Websites|
Lawyers and law firms have standing to sue those who engage in the unauthorized practice of law. See Richard F. Mallen & Associated LTd. V. Myinjuryclaim.com Corp, Ill. App. Ct. [...]
Source Peter Krakaur|2017-06-26T18:41:09-07:00Jul 18th, 2002|Categories: LegalEthics, Post|Tags: Advertising, Cloud, Confidentiality, E-mail, MDP, States, UPL|
ASPs. Very Dangerous. You Go First, an article written by David Hricik and Peter Krakaur, outlines the ethical issues associated with the use of Application Service Providers (ASPs).
Source Peter Krakaur|2017-06-26T18:41:10-07:00Jul 18th, 2002|Categories: LegalEthics, Post|Tags: Internet Use, Ohio, States, UPL|
A decision issued in late December 2001 by the Ohio Board of Commissioners on the Unauthorized Practice of the Law (ODC v. Palmer) may help define whether certain online conduct [...]
Source Peter Krakaur|2017-06-26T18:41:12-07:00Mar 4th, 2002|Categories: LegalEthics, Post|Tags: Advertising, Attorney-client relationship, Confidentiality, Disclaimers, New Mexico, Social Networking, UPL|
New Mexico Opinion 2001-1Â addresses the application of Rules of Professional Conduct to Lawyer's Use of Listserve-type Message Boards and Communications.
