TAG: Conflicts: LegalEthics.com resources relating to Conflicts. Subscribe
Source Peter Krakaur|2017-06-26T18:33:56-07:00Nov 6th, 2013|Categories: LegalEthics, Post|Tags: ABA, Advertising, Conflicts, Disclaimers, Internet Use, Websites|
Lawyers may use deal-of-the-day or group-coupon marketing programs as a way to sell goods and services. However, lawyers hoping to market legal services using these programs must comply with various [...]
Source Peter Krakaur|2017-06-26T18:33:58-07:00May 15th, 2013|Categories: LegalEthics, Post|Tags: Advertising, Arizona, Attorney-client relationship, Confidentiality, Conflicts, Fee sharing|
State Bar of Arizona Ethics Opinion 13-01 addressed whether an Internet marketing voucher or coupon sold by a lawyer for legal representation is consistent with the Arizona Rules of Professional [...]
Source Peter Krakaur|2017-06-26T18:34:03-07:00Feb 12th, 2013|Categories: LegalEthics, Post|Tags: Advertising, Conflicts, Fee sharing, Indiana|
Indiana lawyers should not use Groupon or similar coupon or daily deal sites to market legal services. See Indiana Ethics Op. 2012-1.
Source Peter Krakaur|2017-06-26T18:36:23-07:00Jan 15th, 2013|Categories: LegalEthics, Post|Tags: Advertising, Alabama, Conflicts, Fee sharing|
Alabama lawyers may not use of websites like Groupon to sell their legal services because it violates the ethics rule against sharing legal fees with nonlawyers, as well as the [...]
Source Peter Krakaur|2017-06-26T18:36:26-07:00Jan 14th, 2012|Categories: LegalEthics, Post|Tags: Advertising, Conflicts, Pennsylvania, Websites|
Pennsylvania lawyers should not use coupon sites to market their legal services. See Pennsylvania Ethics Op. 2011-027.
Source Peter Krakaur|2017-06-26T18:37:58-07:00Jun 16th, 2008|Categories: LegalEthics, Post|Tags: Confidentiality, Conflicts, E-mail, Electronic Files, Internet Use, Malpractice, Meta-data|
Colorado has addressed whether lawyers can review metadata sent by opposing counsel outside the context of discovery. The summary states: A Sending Lawyer who transmits electronic documents or files has [...]
Source Peter Krakaur|2017-06-26T18:37:59-07:00Feb 20th, 2008|Categories: LegalEthics, Post|Tags: Attorney-client privilege, Attorney-client relationship, Confidentiality, Conflicts, Disclaimers, E-mail, Internet Use, New Hampshire, Rules of Conduct, Websites|
Effective January 1, 2008, New Hampshire adopted a rule that clearly protects persons who, in good faith, e-mail confidential information to a lawyer from having the lawyer use the information [...]
Source Peter Krakaur|2017-06-26T18:38:21-07:00Aug 31st, 2007|Categories: LegalEthics, Post|Tags: Confidentiality, Conflicts, E-mail|
I don't think this is on-line, but in an August 8 opinoin (07-02), the Iowa State Bar Association Committee on Ethics and Practice Guidelines addressed an interesting prospective client problem:Â [...]
Source Peter Krakaur|2017-07-11T11:31:07-07:00Jun 7th, 2007|Categories: LegalEthics, Post|Tags: Attorney-client relationship, Confidentiality, Conflicts, Disclaimers, Massachusetts, Websites|
In the absence of an effective disclaimer, a lawyer who receives unsolicited information from a prospective client through an e-mail link on a law firm website must hold the information [...]
Source Peter Krakaur|2017-06-26T18:38:25-07:00Jan 17th, 2007|Categories: LegalEthics, Post|Tags: Advertising, Confidentiality, Conflicts, Disclaimers, Solicitation, Washington, Websites|
Lawyers must consider confidentiality and other ethical issues associated with inquiries they receive through a website. Informal opinion 2080 (2006).
