TAG: Advertising: LegalEthics.com resources relating to advertising. Subscribe
Source Peter Krakaur|2017-06-26T18:36:23-07:00Jan 10th, 2013|Categories: LegalEthics, Post|Tags: Advertising, California, Social Networking, Websites|
Material posted by an attorney on a social media website is subject to professional responsibility rules and standards governing attorney advertising if that material constitutes a “communication” within the meaning of [...]
Source Peter Krakaur|2017-06-26T18:36:26-07:00Jan 14th, 2012|Categories: LegalEthics, Post|Tags: Advertising, Conflicts, Pennsylvania, Websites|
Pennsylvania lawyers should not use coupon sites to market their legal services. See Pennsylvania Ethics Op. 2011-027.
Source Peter Krakaur|2017-06-26T18:36:26-07:00Jan 3rd, 2012|Categories: LegalEthics, Post|Tags: Advertising, South Carolina, Websites|
The use of “daily deal†websites to sell vouchers to be redeemed for discounted legal services does not violate the Rule 5.4(a) prohibition on sharing of legal fees, but the [...]
Source Peter Krakaur|2017-06-26T18:36:27-07:00Jan 3rd, 2012|Categories: LegalEthics, Post|Tags: Advertising, New York, Websites|
A lawyer may market legal services on a “deal of the day†or “group coupon†website provided that the advertising is not misleading or deceptive and makes clear that no [...]
Source Peter Krakaur|2017-06-26T18:36:27-07:00Dec 11th, 2011|Categories: LegalEthics, Post|Tags: Advertising, North Carolina, Websites|
North Carolina lawyers may advertise on a website that offers daily discounts to consumers where the website company’s compensation is a percentage of the amount paid to the lawyer if [...]
Source Peter Krakaur|2017-06-26T18:36:59-07:00Dec 1st, 2010|Categories: LegalEthics, Post|Tags: Advertising, Attorney-client relationship, Internet Use, Kentucky, Rules of Conduct, Social Networking|
The article with links to the proposal are here. To avoid getting any Kentucky readers in trouble, please don't blog about this! :-)
Source Peter Krakaur|2017-06-26T18:37:01-07:00Oct 15th, 2010|Categories: LegalEthics, Post|Tags: Advertising, Louisiana, Websites|
A recent decision of the Louisiana Supreme Court held that a law firm's executive committee is legally responsible for misstatements on a law firm's website.
Source Peter Krakaur|2017-06-26T18:37:29-07:00Oct 26th, 2009|Categories: LegalEthics, Post|Tags: Advertising, Internet Use|
The South Carolina bar association addressed a hypothetical webside that listed attorneys without their involvement, and allows "clients" and others to "rate" the attorney. The bar association held that a [...]
Source Peter Krakaur|2017-06-26T18:37:32-07:00May 30th, 2009|Categories: LegalEthics, Post|Tags: Advertising, Florida|
The Florida Supreme Court rejected the state bar's proposed rule amendments on lawyer web site advertising. See In re Amendments to the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar - Rule 4-7.6, [...]
Source Peter Krakaur|2017-06-26T18:37:56-07:00Oct 8th, 2008|Categories: LegalEthics, Post|Tags: Advertising, e-Discovery, Meta-data|
On November 7, the Law School will host the 9th annual Georgia Symposium on Professionalism and Ethics. The topic for this years symposium is "Ethics and professionalism in the Digital [...]
