A lawyer may not pay to participate in the for-profit client/attorney internet matching service because the Service substantially functions as, and holds itself out as, a referral service and because the information presented by the Service on behalf of participating lawyers is materially misleading. See Arizona Opinion #05-08 (July 2005).
Lawyers may not pay to participate in the for-profit client/attorney Internet matching service
This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.